Here's the thing: How would you feel if the bank sent someone over to tell you that while you are not doing anything illegal, they don't LIKE the way that you are living in their house? It's horrifically invasive and offensive.
I don't know Tx law... but in most states I've lived in, after 1 year the LL is required to paint, and after x number of years (most commonly 2-3) the landlord is required to replace the carpet. As I'm sure you know 90% of normal wear and tear is on the paint and carpet.
You CAN require that a residence be available for repair people/ exterminators/ etc... but typically it has to be on the renter's schedule (AKA, you pay for it, but they set the time and date) OR a notice has to be given and marked received x number of weeks in advance. For good reason... (and I've been on both sides of the fence, renting and LL). Having work people show up when you're not ready for them (don't they ALWAYS come at the worst times???) is frustrating to say the least. From a LL perspective, having the signed notice (if I'm scheduling them) means that if the tenants aren't prepared then THEY pay for either the extra time or for the trip charge to have them come back out. (I usually prefer to leave it up to the tenant to schedule, for just that reason... I just give them a 30-60 day time period, and then the co notifies me when it's complete). Obviously, I can see why if you're dealing with multiple units why you would only want one trip charge.
The thing is though, while the trip charge is legitimate... if their lease isn't up... you can't really tell them how to live, regardless of how well intentioned you are. If you think it's a matter warranting CPS, then call them... but don't take it upon yourselves to police them.
* * *
Our "last" land lords (my H now refuses to deal with individuals anymore, leasing companies only) had absolutely NO boundaries. Finals week, baby had the flu, and they had the NERVE to complain that the house was a mess. They showed up with a work crew the DAY OF MY WEDDING with 30 minutes notice. While we were out of town for a week our house sitter said they tried to gain entry 4 times. The grass was too long, we pruned the tree back too short, my son was naked (my son was naked in the house a lot... he loves the water and we had a hottub... we also had no air conditioning), there was mud on the carpet, they didn't like the way our furniture was arranged... my god... the list goes on. Now they were generally nice people, and I've had close relationships with both LL's and tenants in the past, and I have ALWAYS gotten my cleaning deposits back. But these people were attached to OUR HOME, like it was theirs. Their house, but our home. We would return it in good condition, but their constant demands that we keep it how they wanted it kept was both illegal and incredibly frustrating. We eventually had to go through HUD and file a complaint against them. They were fined, required to go to a 60 day landlord "school", and barred from the property. We weren't using drugs, committing any illegal activities, or non-paying of our rent. As the judge said, they'd get the house back at the end of the lease.
You sound like a nice person, but if their standard of living is merely below yours (aka they're not committing illegal acts) ... you need to give them their space to live their lives. If at the end when they move the damage deposit doesn't cover the damages (excluding LL responsible things like painting/carpet), then you bill them. If they refuse to pay the bill you send it to collections. DO do an exit walkthrough, and DO take pictures AFTER they hand over the keys (our LL's tried to take pictures as we were moving, before we'd even finished packing much less had the carpets cleaned, and done the final move out clean... and they tried to use them in court. The judge looked at OUR pictures and sided in our favor in about 10 seconds). They tried to charge us 7k in "damages". 8500 of which were deemed, well fradulent is the wrong term. But to give you an idea of how we left the house, we were not only judge not to have to pay the "damages" but 1500 (the entire refundable part) of our 2000 deposit was judged to be returned to us
From having been on both sides,
R