PEOPLE! READ what the person wrote BEFORE you write your comments!
She stated that ALL of the adults in this party sat at a table in the restaurant that only had adults, while ALL the children in this party sat at a table that only had children--and one of those children was in a carseat! THEREFORE, there was NO ADULT SUPERVISION at the children's table. AND these children were young--4 to 5 years old--which in my opinion is WAY TOO YOUNG to be by themselves at their own table.
I see putting very young children at a table by themselves without an adult present as disrespectful, not counting no adult supervision or monitoring. From what this commentor says, unless the kids REALLY ACTED UP, the parents never looked at them or chastised them.
Really? Totally bad parenting on their part. Totally.
AND the fact this was at a Chinese Buffet somehow makes this restaurant subhuman, like it's a fast food drive-thru? Really? Our Chinese Buffet here in town is actually a restaurant, thank you very much, and it is treated like a restaurant. It is in no way, shape, or form a "fast food drive thru" that can be trashed as such, nor is it treated as such. I don't know where some of you commentors below live, but I'll make sure to skirt your area if I'm ever coming through for more enlightened areas that actually care how their places of business are perceived.
The commentor said NOTHING about an occasional child sitting WITH HIS PARENTS and acting up once in a while. She's talking about an entire booth full of children too young to be sitting by themselves without adult supervision. And leaving a young baby in a carseat by the children and not by the adults... ::shudder:: THAT's just an incident disaster waiting to happen.
I have one incident that happened when my daughter was about 2 years old I can relate. She has sensory processing issues. Even with that issue, she normally is very, very well behaved in restaurants. (She learned from babyhood on that if she couldn't control herself in a restaurant that we leave. Period. And that means WITHOUT eating. Any of us.)
For some reason, this one afternoon when we went to a Damon's restaurant, she was a hellion. We'd received our food and hadn't even had a chance to start eating when my child decided to start throwing stuff. Stuff off the table, her food, whatever. She'd never done that before--not even at home--nor had she ever watched any other kids do such a thing. My husband and I were absolutely horrified. Don't know what got in her that day, but it was an expensive dinner. Not only did we pay for our food and leave without eating--as you need to remove the child from the offensive behavior--but we also handed the poor waitor a $20 when my kid went into meltdown mode when she realized we were removing her from her "happy zone" to compensate for cleaning up, as we had our hands full with her and were unable to help clean.
Talking our kid down from her meltdown, though, took hours.
So yes, understand completely where this commentor is coming from. Had an incident happen with my own child; however, we removed ourselves from the situation pronto INSTEAD OF allowing the situation to deteriorate into something much, much worse and much more distracting for the other patrons who were trying to eat.
End of story.
Children learn to act based upon how they are taught. If the parent(s) don't want to teach the child how to behave in public, then in my opinon, they shouldn't be there. Eating out--in a restaurant--is, in my opinion, a privilege. Since it's a privilege, if a person/child can't act grown up enough to eat out like a big person, then that person/child can remain at home and eat.
Again, end of story.
My sister and brother parent their kids the same way. We grew up the same way; that's how our parents taught us to behave in public. None of us--to include neices and nephews--has any issues with eating out or being out in public. We know how to behave.