I have not had to deal with peanut allergies but I am allergic to almonds, bananas, watermelons, and some raw foods, the list goes on and on and on. I carry a bottle of liquid Benadryl with me at all times, or the little poppers where you just twist off the top. I am learning more about them every day.
I have been told that casual contact is considered to be when the nut or allergen is on your body, clothes, or even residue in your mouth that the nut can get on items and therefor be touched by the person who has that sensitive of an allergy. Even breathing the nut smell can set off some allergic reactions.
There are such different kinds of allergies. The one I have is an oral allergy. I eat a raw potato and I itch in my throat for an hour or more. Same with raw onions, banana's, and some fruits. It is related to birch tree pollen from what I can learn.
Some just touch the debris of the allergen and their lives are in danger. Some must ingest it to have a reaction. I don't do any kind of nuts although I should be okay to eat peanuts and some other kinds.
I feel bad for the parents of kids who suffer with allergies so severe. Seriously, who would wish that on even an enemy. BUT they do have the responsibility to protect their child just as I have the right to be my grandchildren's advocate. They should be allowed to eat the foods they want and love just as a child who doesn't like a food to be allowed to not eat it.
__________________________________________
It comes down to this to me. If you "protect" one child from an allergen then you "must" protect all persons from allergens.
SO, let's say I worked at this school. Just for the sake of seeing the other side of this.
Then "I" could claim they cannot serve watermelon, almonds, cantaloupe, well, heck, all melons are on the list but I just have never taken the chance so I want them all banned. Apples and cherries are on the list too. If they are cooked I can eat them so I could insist the school not be allowed to have them in the building in any form except cooked. I have had to ride to the hospital in the back of an ambulance for an allergic reaction to almonds. My throat swelled a lot. I could barely breath.
I reacted to 74 out of 80 things I was tested against for allergies. I reacted so bad to tobacco that my back had a blister about 8" across, it effected the skin reactions so much on my back they had to do them over on my arms and prick the skin for most. Animals, trees, grasses, critters that live in our walls like mice and roaches, molds, fungus, etc....I have proof I am allergic to these.
Therefore anyone who works at the school or visits the school cannot be a smoker or use tobacco in any form. I have doctors proof that they touched my skin with a tobacco residue and they had to give me Epinephrine and Benadryl to save my life.
Lets take out all school pets/animals and all the property must be covered with gravel or some other form of natural cover, because with my allergies grass cannot be allowed. If someone were to even try to mow I would have an asthma attack so grass has to go. Trees too.
Then let's say someone else is allergic to dairy. That takes out the milk and cheese, they might have the tiniest bit of cheese sauce drip onto the serving that child might get.
Then theirs the kid allergic to tomatoes, that takes out ketchup.
And so forth and on and on. Each person can have allergies and they should not be discriminated against either or segregated.
This is my point. At WHAT point do we draw the line? At some point someone somewhere can be found to be allergic to each and every food.
Where is the line drawn? Who says this child's allergy is more important than that child's allergy. You don't turn blue enough so your allergy doesn't count? Your throat only swells halfway shut, you only have an asthma attack, you only get hives and have to take drugs that make you sleepy and rub ointments all over...who determines which allergies are the "right" ones that kids are protected against?
I have allergies. It is my responsibility to know that I might react to a certain food and stay away from it. It is MY job to protect the people I am responsible for. The school has enough issues to deal with from bully's to neglectful parents to kids like my grandson who got sent home by noon today after at least 10 time outs, he's in pre-K by the way.
Schools are a supposed to be a safe place for all kids. Not a place where their choices are ripped away for one child's allergies. Everyone is allergic to something. They may not have had the opportunity to eat it yet but there will be something.
So do we make a huge long list of banned foods? Because if your child gets special treatment to make his environment safer then if my child has an allergy you better be danged sure you make a way for him to be safe too. The lists could be unending and pretty soon everyone is on a pill that is a food supplement made of protein and carbohydrates. Then nothing but water is allowed for drinking.
I feel bad for these parents because there is no way their child will ever be 100% safe against a reaction of some sort. It cannot be done in our world. They have to be living in constant fear. I can't imagine going through what they go through. I think I would have to decide to work in that field and work at their school so that if there was an emergency call something was going on I could grab some life saving equipment out of the fanny pack around my waist and run go do what I could to stop the reaction. I could never not be right there.