There are some misconceptions about vaccines. If you look at the data before widespread vaccination, you will see that the diseases they were vaccinating against were already in a long and steady decline prior to the vaccination age. Look at scarlet fever. No vaccination against it, but where is it in our society? Just an example. Here is a chart of disease related deaths from 1901 to 1975, broken down by decades, up to 1966, when widespead vaccines began:
What You Should Know About Vaccines
From Dr.Monteith's Letter July 2002
http://educate-yourself.org/vcd/knowaboutvaccines24oct02....
October 24, 2002
U.S.A. DEATHS
Diphtheria Pertussis Tetanus Measles
1901 48,839 33,094 28,065 11,956
1911 20,350 20,285 11,503 7,615
1921 12,267 14,724 7,818 4,919
1931 4,388 9,850 4,709 2,957
1941 1,135 4,399 2,384 1,013
1946 467 1,460 1,697 469
1951 125 558 1,093 268
1956 45 206 788 203
1961 22 82 550 162
1966 15 32 282 44
1971-5 12 122 122 17
Clean water, good nutrition, sanitation, warm homes, and antibiotics brought most communicable diseases under control long before vaccines were introduced. Would the death rates have continued to decline without vaccines? The yearly death rate from measles fell to 44 before the measles vaccine was introduced. [15] Dr. Edward Shorter discussed the decline in diphtheria deaths before all children were vaccinated:
". . . as the list of diseases that penicillin would cure . . . became longer and longer. . . . Between 1945 and 1955 in the United States, mortality from influenza and pneumonia fell by 47 percent; deaths from syphilis dropped 78 percent. Deaths from diphtheria - for not all children had been vaccinated - virtually vanished, the mortality from that disease falling by 92 percent." [16]
Not as convincing that the vaccines did much, is it. People don't look at those numbers. You can see that Pertussis actually increased. People have been taught well by big-pharma to believe what they want you to believe. They write the text books that doctors read and study in med school. They own our medical system. Follow the money-trail. And, study and research. Be knowledgable about it. You are right to question this practice.
Also, how does disease normally enter our bodies? Through the mouth/nose. Your body has filters to strain out disease and process it in a particular way. Injecting these toxins directly into the blood stream is extremely risky. They have not had the benefit of passing through your liver/kidneys/intestines/etc. We have these filters for a reason. We have skin that protects us from toxins. To skip all of that and go right to the bloodstream is foolishness. We're asking for trouble. And, by the way, side effects can show up years later: childhood diabetes is on the rise, cancers have been linked to vaccines, autoimmune diseases (MS, gluten intolerance, etc), ADD/ADHD, many other ailments that our children in this generation are having in great numbers that never were before. I don't think that vaccinations are the only contributing factor, but I do believe they are strongly to blame for this. You are wise to look further into this. Bless you!
EDITED:
I don't know why that line up there shows up like a phone number. It's not meant to be it's the year (1951) and the stats.
Also, most people who get whooping cough have been fully vaccinated against it. We have been scared into compliance by fear-mongering. We have so many better options available today, including the simplicity of a clean and sterile environment for patients and antibiotics.