I don't know where those stories came from, but it made for a little chuckle this morning. I'd been told it was bad "luck" to cut hair before 1. I'd not heard that a child needs to be 2 or be able to talk. WHY? That's stupid. And clippers because his head is soft.......would only apply if you're going to do a military buzz cut and shave it all off! Otherwise, it's not even touching his head (or neck either). The ONLY reason I can figure for those silly tales you've been fed is that some babies fuss or cry so the theory is that if they wait until the baby is old enough to sit down and be quiet, it'd be easier. I personally think it'd be harder. The longer you wait, the bigger the "event".
My brother was right at 1 when he got his hair cut. My oldest son has hair like me (lots of it) and got his hair cut around his first birthday. Not for "luck" but because we wanted to take some pictures of him with his "shaggy" (not really long) hair, and then his first haircut on his first birthday. My husband took him to a real barber (he says the barber is a "man thing"), saved a clipping of hair, and the barber even gave them a cute certificate that he'd graduated "babyhood". We took a few pictures, too, because we're nerds like that. For my youngest son, he had almost no hair at 1. He got his hair cut at almost 2 just because there wasn't enough to cut until then (high high hair line, and very faint red hair until then). They both did just fine. They got scissor cuts, and also got the clippers on their necks and right by their ears to clean it up nicely. All they did was get big eyes and the youngest was more shy and timid, and tensed his shoulders and looked at me like "What???" and I just held his hands and said it's ok, he's a big boy, etc. His lower lip stuck out and he looked like he was going to cry, but I just talked him through it. No problems.